Ms. Reddy doesn't know much about history. The jury is still way out on whether Richard III even murdered the princes and most of the evidence and motives are lacking to insist he did. People forget that Billy Shakes was writing in the time of Elizabeth whose grandad was Henry VII, the guy who usurped the throne from Richard's legitimate claim and there's plenty of evidence to suggest that the princes were still alive when Henry ascended to the throne and that he had the deed quietly done. It's already been proven that Richard did not have a hump, withered arm, or gamey leg...these distortions and lies came from the venerable Thomas More who was educated by John Morton, the Bishop of Ely, and Richard's implacable enemy.
There is a book THE TRIAL OF RICHARD III, based on a Channel Four TV program, where a trial was held, presided over by an Old Bailey judge and presented by criminal lawyers to a jury where pretty much every known Ricardian scholar testified. the verdict: Not guilty.
Betram Fields, an eminent Hollywood lawyer (handles people like Spielberg) and Richardian scholar also wrote a book were he very objectively goes through the evidence and comes up with the same conclusion: Richard is innocent of the princes' murder and, indeed, most everything he is accused of.
BK, take them to Musso's...right in the heart of Hollywood. Is Book City still in business?
